![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Flow around a (volley)ball (II) at medium Reynolds number |
|
![]() |
Computational details
|
![]() |
Short description and remarks
|
![]() |
Visualization
|
![]() |
|
Short description and remarks
Flow around a (volley)ball in a channel at medium Reynolds
number (see the
Computational details).
The aim of this study by students was to demonstrate the
influence of the rotation of a volleyball with
respect to different techniques of service. The values to be
controlled were the drag and lift forces which mainly determine
the length and speed of a service, and the difficulty for the
contrary player to control the service ("flatter service").
The following diagrams show the resulting drag and lift
coefficients in time. While the speed of the (volley)ball
was assumed to be 1.5, the rotational speeds were 0 (no
rotation!), 0.1, 1 and 5. While the first three configurations
(rotation speed less or almost equal the speed of the ball)
are very similar, the fourth leads to non-comparable results.
As can be seen, the additional rotation leads to more
negative lift coefficients (that means the ball will "come
down sooner"),
and the drag forces increase! For a comparison, see the
corresponding results for the higher Reynolds number configuration.
It might be interesting to perform the same tests for an even
more realistic Reynolds number, without a
channel configuration, and to examine the effect of
additional 3D effets. So, this pre-study is only a first attempt
in applying the FEATFLOW software in sports sciences, with
qualitative results only, but more realistic simulations should
and can be performed!
|
|
![]() |
|
Visualization
|
|
![]() |
|
Please send any comments and suggestions to: featflow@featflow.de |