In the cases where the calculated nodes can be shown to be spherical designs (N=2,4,6,12), equal weights are optimal. This can be seen with the aid of Theorems 3 and 4. In all other cases appropriate weights have to be calculated.
With the aid of multivariate interpolation theory this is at least possible
if the number N of nodes equals the dimension of the linear
space of polynomials . For r=3 this means that
.
Let
and let
be the symmetric matrix being
composed of the evaluation of the kernel
at the nodes
,
.
If are a fundamental system,
i. e.
, then the interpolation property
and the following consequence of the reproducing property of
are valid.
Here, denote the Lagrange fundamental polynomials.
Equations (6) and (7) lead to
which means that the matrices
and
are inverse to each other.
Consider now a cubature formula
The function f can be substituted in the usual way by its
interpolation polynomial p with regard to the nodes . Then
that is
Because and
this yields
which is the row-sum of the matrix L.
Thus, because of (1), the weights of the cubature formula can be
computed as the row-sum of the symmetric matrix
The Gegenbauer polynomials of degree m with index r/2 occuring
in this composition have the representation
with .
They can be evaluated with the aid of their recurrence relation (see
e. g. Reimer [16])
The inversion of the matrix can be avoided.
With
we obtain the vector of
weights as solution of the linear system of equations
In the following, we study the case r=3, that is , in detail,
but the theory can be extended to higher
dimensions without any difficulties.
The cases cannot be handled yet except for those cases in
which the nodes are spherical designs.
These are the cases N = 2,4,6,12 . The weights then can be chosen to be
.
The cases N=3,5,7 also show a regular behaviour, but up to now it could
not be decided if these nodes are spherical designs.
As interpolatory formulae our cubatures have a degree of exactness
equal to m, whereas the spherical designs yield a degree of exactness
equal to 2m or 2m+1, respectively.